Artifactual Literacies

In the reading for this week, the Pahl and Rowsell's article on artifactual literacies was extremely intriguing to explore.  The emphasis on objects as a form of literacy is very important in understanding the other communities and lives of others.  Pahl sheds light on how objects are a part of every person's life and that they can be powerful.  Literacy is mostly viewed as speaking or listening but it can in fact come in many forms.  A golden nugget I took in this article about artifactual literacies was when Pahl says, "Artifactual literacies takes account of migrant literacies by bringing to life the actual objects, whether remembered in narratives or actually present in homes, that evoke experiences of the country where people have come from."  In the broad sense of things, there is always a story behind the objects that are in every type of community.  In the classroom, this can be an exceptional way for students to share a part of their culture and the story behind the object.  Bringing in objects from their home for presentation to the class would work in any classroom, but personally I see it working best in an urban school setting where there are many different stories that can be told from different types of races.  If these urban students are struggling in the classroom and find it hard to connect to peers or their teacher, bringing in a piece of their culture is a way to get these students to open up.  Writing is one way to get students to open up and tell about their culture but objects and artifacts can sometimes display a stronger message.  When kids see new and exciting things brought into their classroom, it can trigger a sense of excitement and get them to ask questions.  Students cannot get enough positive feedback, especially from their peers because this is where they look for approval and acceptance.  When a student might shares an experience and a piece of themselves with the object this allows for not only the other students to get to know their peer better but also the teacher as well.  If we can understand the background of our students on a deeper level and gauge what they are interested in, this creates a pathway to deeper connections between teacher and student. 

More Than Three Ideas Are OK

Michelle Kenney's article was one that I found to be very intriguing in the way that she talked about how kids are essentially programmed to write in a specific way that often limits their ideas in writing.  A quote from her article that stood out to me the most was when she said, "Seriously? How could one of the brightest and most talented kids I had ever met question her right to have more than three ideas about immigration?"  This moment is one of realization for Kenney as she comes across a student in her class who is programmed to make a five paragraph essay with only three supporting ideas for the paper.  It is the sad reality of teaching the five paragraph essay or other essay formats that hinder kids from going beyond these formats and putting their own ideas and creativity into their writing.  Kenney brings up a great point in that these types of writing formats are basically run down versions of writing that lacks both creativity and critical thinking.  If kids are thinking only about three ideas for each body paragraph and believing that they cannot go beyond those ideas, then this is hindering their learning tremendously.  Kenney learns this scary fact when her student who has a lot of talent and is very bright thinks that she is limited to her thoughts on immigration.  Often times when we limit our students and give them rigid formatting and rubrics to get them to produce writing, kids will simply follow the rules and will not learn how to think outside of the box.  As in this part of the article, the student feels as though she is not allowed to put her own critical thinking into her paper and that is the limitation of setting standards in our schools.  It is important to remember that in writing, there is more than one way to write and ideas that students come up with should be praised and encouraged because this supports creativity.  Limitation with standards and rubrics for every type of writing is a step in the wrong direction for students. 

Why Poetry?

The readings on poetry were extremely eye opening and much of what was said by Macaluso really caught my attention.  Her first poem about poems was extremely interesting because many writers tend to avoid writing poems and her article alone explains why we so desperately need poems as writers.  To live in a way so that poems find us is the biggest part to take away from Macaluso's poem about poems.  Poems allow us to express so much of the unsaid things in our mind that flow onto the paper.  Why are poems so confusing?  It is probably for the reason that the ideas in a poem come from a lot of inner expression that we as writers cannot quite explain.  Poems are almost like a fingerprint on the page that is all our own as the authors and we sometimes have to explain what we mean by the words we are saying in the poem.
 Poems can be more formulaic in the sense that some have patterns and many of them do not have full sentences for many lines at a time and that can seem confusing for readers at a glance.  However, isn't anything you read in literature or writing up for interpretation?  That is the true beauty of a poem, in that we cannot out our finger on the exact interpretation but we can toy and play with the words to delve deeper meaning from the words.
    The words in a poem alone also give us insight into the world around us, as Macaluso says.  Sensory wording in a poem helps to paint a picture in the reader's mind to find a deeper meaning.  While we can do so in another form of writing, a poem lets the writer play with words and put them in places that open our eyes to the real world.  It could be two words put together or three lines of abstract wording and either situation can make a poem so powerful in the way that we see the theme or idea that an author is trying to get across in his/her poem.  As Macaluso points to, language and experience have are the key parts to a poem that students can play with and create a better understanding of how the two relate to each other. 

Cyberactivism and Critical Media Literacy

                 Both of these readings were particularly interesting, as they reflect on the power that comes with people using the internet as a medium to make a point or how the media in general can affect young students.  The part that stuck out the most for me in Chapter 6 on cyberactivism was the section on cyberpunks.  The term immediately points to a negative image of young people abusing the internet for literacy practices that get themselves into activities that they should not be getting in to.  The chapter, however, states that this term is used more for shedding light on the seriousness of the situation rather than just deeming it a negative term.  These cyberpunks are using this form of literacy to create revolutions of ideas that can immediately impact thousands of people in our virtual world.  These cyberpunks have found a reality that furthers knowledge in a way that gets out their ideas much faster and efficiently than someone who does not sit behind the screen. This in itself makes whoever sits at the computer and very powerful person for the time being.
                  The chapter on critical media literacy seems to be a topic that is a more widely discussed topic than cyberactivism.  It talks about the affect of mass media on the youth more predominately but also has set the tone for the way society functions and how it circles around media production.  Children are subjected to the bad parts of the media such as fast food and cigarette commercials.
 However, these commercials and images that we see on the TV screen are shaping the way we think today.  Mass hysteria can be involved through exposure to the media and just like cyberactivism, this can produce so much power.  The widespread knowledge projected through the media is more likely to stick in the minds of the young people and adults in society.  The more widespread something is, the quicker people are to believe it.  Young people should be informed on the validity of certain information in the media and go to other sources before they swear by it as the truth.  Everything is subject to change and the sooner children learn this, the better they will shape our future in terms of the media.